Amazon just confirmed another massive round of layoffs-14,000 employees across the company-with Amazon Games taking a hard pivot away from much of its internal AAA and MMO ambitions. That’s grim for devs and usually bad news for players. But buried in the restructuring is a big exception: Crystal Dynamics’ next Tomb Raider, which Amazon is publishing, is officially safe. As someone who’s watched Amazon’s stop-start journey in games since Crucible, this says a lot about where the company thinks it can actually win.
In an internal note, Amazon leadership outlined a major reset for the games division: fewer internal big-ticket builds, more targeted publishing. That means significant cuts in Irvine and San Diego and a leaner central publishing team. The company framed it as focusing resources on “the best gaming experiences,” which is classic corporate gloss—translation: the high-burn, high-risk internal MMO projects didn’t justify their costs.
One line matters most for players waiting on Lara Croft: “We continue to work with our partners at Crystal Dynamics on the next Tomb Raider.” That confirmation, echoed in trade coverage, signals that Amazon’s publishing model—not its in-house dev footprint—is where it sees traction. It tracks with other partnerships sticking around too, including publishing duties for Maverick Games’ unannounced open-world racer from ex-Forza Horizon leadership. Meanwhile, Amazon’s Montreal outfit is said to be finishing March of Giants, and the internal “Studio 5” will tinker with lighter, experimental Luna projects like Courtroom Chaos: Starring Snoop Dogg. Bold? Absolutely. Bankable? We’ll see.
On paper, Tomb Raider is exactly the kind of project you don’t axe during a belt-tightening: it’s an iconic single-player franchise with decades of brand recognition, and Amazon’s role is publishing, not maintaining a giant live-service team. That structure insulates the game from internal layoffs because Crystal Dynamics carries development, and Amazon bankrolls, markets, and distributes.
Crystal Dynamics has the pedigree. The 2013 reboot and Rise of the Tomb Raider remain high-water marks for cinematic action-adventure design. Shadow of the Tomb Raider (primarily Eidos-Montréal) didn’t hit quite as hard, but the series never lost its identity. The new entry is on Unreal Engine 5 and was teased back in 2022; expect a slick technical showcase with a familiar blend of traversal, puzzling, stealth takedowns, and semi-open hubs—think the best bits of Rise, modernized.
There are still wildcards. Crystal Dynamics is co-developing Perfect Dark with The Initiative, and Embracer’s ongoing restructuring has rocked multiple studios. Even with Amazon’s support, scheduling could slip. But survival through cost-cutting tells us Amazon believes Tomb Raider has clear ROI without the live-service baggage that sank other bets.
If you’ve followed Amazon Games, you know the pattern. Breakaway was canceled. Crucible launched, unlaunched, then died. The Lord of the Rings MMO fell apart in a contract shuffle. New World was the outlier—a genuine hit at launch—before retention woes forced a rethink, culminating in the Aeternum push to bring it to consoles and try for a second life. Meanwhile, Lost Ark succeeded in the West, but that’s a publishing win for a Smilegate game, not a homegrown triumph.
Today’s pivot basically codifies that history: Amazon is better at amplifying games it believes in than building giant online worlds from scratch. It’s not a bad strategy; it’s just honest. Publishing Tomb Raider and partnering with proven talent like Maverick Games plays to Amazon’s strengths—distribution, marketing muscle, and platform tie-ins—without the billion-dollar burn of sustaining a new MMO forever.
For Tomb Raider fans, the signal is steady: the game’s development continues, and Amazon’s cuts shouldn’t derail it. I wouldn’t expect a sudden live-service swerve; the franchise thrives on authored, cinematic adventures. The bigger questions are timeline and tone. Does Crystal lean into survival grit like the 2013 reboot, or pivot back toward pulpy tomb raiding with less trauma and more clever puzzle-boxes? I’m hoping for the latter, paired with less bloat and tighter hub design.
For Amazon’s broader catalog, prepare for fewer grand internal experiments and more curated publishing plays. That could be good news if it means higher hit rate and less “launch, flail, sunset.” The Luna-side curios—like that Snoop Dogg courtroom oddity—sound like low-risk experiments to keep a catalog fresh, not pillars you build a platform on.
The caveat: Crystal Dynamics still operates under an Embracer umbrella that’s been ruthless about cuts. Even if Amazon’s money is solid, external turbulence can ripple into timelines. Keep expectations flexible until we see real gameplay and a date.
If Amazon sticks this landing—let Crystal Dynamics make a great Tomb Raider, avoid nickel-and-diming, and support with smart marketing—it could be a turning point for Amazon as a credible premium publisher rather than a flailing platform holder. Show us the game, commit to single-player first, and save the cross-promo stunts for after credits.
Amazon’s laying off thousands and scaling back internal game dev, but Tomb Raider is safe because it’s an external Crystal Dynamics project Amazon publishes. That’s the new strategy: fewer in-house moonshots, more proven partners. Good for Lara. Jury’s out on everything else.
Get access to exclusive strategies, hidden tips, and pro-level insights that we don't share publicly.
Ultimate Gaming Strategy Guide + Weekly Pro Tips