Let me level with you: I care about F1 games more than most people care about their morning espresso. I’m the sim-racing junkie who plans his Friday evening around qualifying, still winces at Suzuka’s 130R after a decade, and has logged countless virtual race weekends chasing that ever-elusive perfect apex. When EA and Codemasters finally unveiled F1 25’s full track roster—with its five LiDAR‐scanned upgrades, three reverse layouts, and the painful omission of some fan favorites—I went from pure elation to frustrated rant mode within seconds.
This isn’t just another checklist of the world championship circuits. It’s the clearest signal yet that the F1 series is courting purists, sim racers, and hardcore wheel‐and‐pedal aficionados—while still playing licensing hardball. Here’s the headline breakdown:
“LiDAR is the difference between seeing shadows and feeling the bumps,” explains F1 25 producer Sarah Hughes in a recent developer diary. Previous Codemasters titles relied primarily on photogrammetry—stitching hundreds of photos into 3D meshes—and manual measurements. LiDAR, by contrast, emits laser pulses that map every millimeter of track surface, kerb angle and cambers, capturing up to 2 million points per square meter. That jump in precision isn’t just cosmetic: it reshapes the physics model and tyre simulation engine.
In F1 23, an undulating kerb might have been approximated by a smooth bump in the collision mesh. In F1 25, that same section can be a mini-washboard that unsettles the rear axle if you slice the apex too aggressively. According to former F1 sim-racing champion Olly Smith, “On Miami’s LiDAR version, I can feel a 4mm shift in camber as I approach Turn 15. That’s the kind of feedback that changes your setup and line choices.”
When I first heard about “Silverstone Reverse,” I rolled my eyes so hard I nearly lost traction. Yet after 50 laps at full tilt, I’m a believer. Corners you’ve banked into 2,000 times become blind, elevation changes that were previously innocuous now trigger mid-corner oversteer, and braking markers sit in places you never anticipate. Senior AI programmer Alex Byrne confirms that reverse layouts forced the team to retrain their neural-net AI from scratch, yielding more unpredictable races and fresh overtaking gambits.
Sim-racing veteran and Twitch streamer “GridGirl” Tanya Patel ran a community time‐attack series across these reversed tracks. Her verdict? “It’s like learning a new discipline. You’re braking later than ever at Zandvoort’s reverse Tarzan corner. It’s disorienting but exhilarating.”
Paul Ricard, Shanghai and Algarve carried over into F1 24 but will not return in F1 25. According to licensing lead Marco Rossi, “We wanted to focus resources on delivering high-fidelity scans for the core 2025 calendar. Unfortunately, contractual windows for certain historic venues didn’t align.” That sounds reasonable until you consider the precedent: F1 2019 dropped Hockenheim and Valencia, only to reintroduce Hockenheim as a classic track in F1 2021. The community suspects cost-saving measures more than design philosophy.
On r/simracing, longtime user “ApexHunter89” lamented: “Dropping Algarve after one year in F1 24 was a slap in the face. It was one of the most technically demanding layouts, perfect for setup experimentation.” Indeed, Algarve’s relentless undulations could have benefited from LiDAR the most—but instead it vanished entirely.
EA’s approach to track lineups has evolved in five-year cycles. Early F1 Race Stars and F1 2010 offered 20–22 circuits loosely based on the season plus a handful of retro venues. The 2015–2018 era introduced classic tracks like Estoril and Imola, bolstered by modder demand. F1 2019 marked the first major cut—no Hockenheim or Valencia—but added a “historic shell” for Monaco 1991. F1 2021 onwards has leaned heavily into official calendars, licensing deals, and now LiDAR fidelity.
This mini-case study shows a pendulum swinging between variety and authenticity. F1 25 sits firmly on the “official” side, trading occasional historic gems for state-of-the-art scanning and laser-sharp accuracy in five key venues.
In photogrammetry, developers capture hundreds of overlapping photos from drones and ground rigs, then use software to build a mesh with texture maps. It’s cost-effective but limited in capturing sub-centimeter details. LiDAR rigs—mounted on modified GT cars or specialized drones—fire thousands of laser pulses per second, colliding with the surface and returning precise distance measurements. The result is a point cloud that’s converted into an ultra-dense mesh, driving both the visual asset and the physics collider.
According to Codemasters’ lead track artist Javier León, “We feed the raw LiDAR data into our custom pipeline, then overlay high-res textures for asphalt granularity. The physics team then integrates the point cloud into the tyre model, so every bump and ripple affects lateral grip and heat buildup.” This whole-new approach is why you’ll see distinct lap-time gains or losses of several tenths compared to F1 23 on the same hardware.
If your rig is your shrine—direct-drive wheel, load-cell pedals, triple monitors—you crave every nuance. F1 25’s LiDAR circuits grant that tactile feedback in spades, and the reverse layouts force constant adaptation. At the same time, the absence of Paul Ricard’s Mistral straight or Shanghai’s banked Turn 13 deprives us of variety in setup and race craft.
Veteran sim enduro racer and real-world circuit designer Jake Thomason warns, “When you lose technical tracks like Algarve, your learning curve narrows. You risk turning F1 into ‘arcade by another name’ rather than a full-on simulation.”
F1 25’s track roster is unquestionably the most technically advanced in the series’ history. Five LiDAR-scanned circuits redefine realism at the tyre-physics level, reverse layouts breathe new life into familiar venues, and AI gets a rejig to handle the chaos. Yet the departure of three established tracks reminds us that EA’s business priorities still shape the final package.
I’ll pre-order F1 25 on day one—my wheel base is already blinking in anticipation—and I’ll happily pour hundreds more hours into hot-lapping Bahrain’s digital dunes or mastering Suzuka’s S-Curves with every undulation accounted for. But let’s not mistake this as the series’ final form. We need more historic circuits, more off-calendar content, and continued commitment to scanning fidelity across the entire roster, not just a select few.
F1 25 nabs the official 2025 calendar, brings five circuits into full LiDAR fidelity, tosses in three reverse layouts, but drops Paul Ricard, Shanghai, and Algarve—striking a balance between next-level realism and ruthless content curation.
Get access to exclusive strategies, hidden tips, and pro-level insights that we don't share publicly.
Ultimate Gaming Strategy Guide + Weekly Pro Tips