
Game intel
Dungeons of Dusk
Dungeons of DUSK is a classic turn based dungeon crawling RPG that takes place canonically between the episodes of the cult classic FPS. Are you... WORTHY?
New Blood isn’t promising a blockbuster. They’re promising preservation. With Dungeons of Dusk due in 2026 and a Steam Deck‑verified demo dropping during Steam Next Fest (Feb 23), CEO Dave Oshry and developer 68k Studios are leaning on old-school design, platform breadth, and DRM‑free ideals rather than chasing mainstream trends.
Announcing a game across every conceivable platform has become standard PR boilerplate. What’s not standard is leaning hard into preservation as a selling point. New Blood’s catalog reads like a museum’s wishlist: Dusk, Amid Evil, Faith, Rise of the Triad ports and remasters. They aren’t pretending to court a mass audience – they’re explicitly courting preservationists and the “old-school” crowd who want canonical, mechanically faithful continuations of 1990s‑era design.
That posture matters because it sets expectations. When a studio frames its work as cultural triage, you stop asking “Will millions play this?” and start asking “Will it respect the things players care about — controls, difficulty, moddability, DRM stance?” On that score, New Blood is making all the right noises: Steam Deck verification, GOG getting a nod for DRM‑free preservation, and a public demo timed to a community event rather than a flashy global reveal.

Marketing a project as preservation-first is also an easy way to avoid accountability for reach. Saying “we prioritize authenticity over sales” absolves you from promising mainstream polish, live-service support, or post-launch roadmaps aimed at growth. New Blood’s multi-platform claims — including Switch 2 and mobile ports — read less like an aggressive growth strategy and more like a hedged attempt to keep the game accessible to the communities that value it.
Translation: they want their game in as many preservation contexts as possible (Steam, GOG, hardware like Steam Deck and Switch 2) so future players can find and run it. That’s valuable. But it’s not the same as building a release plan designed to scale beyond a dedicated fanbase.

If preservation and authenticity are the thesis, what’s the distribution antithesis? Oshry has publicly praised GOG’s DRM‑free work while questioning whether it can sustainably reach enough users; he told PC Gamer that GOG “needs enough people to give a s**t” or it won’t survive. That tension matters because preservation requires platforms that both host legacy content and reach an audience. Is New Blood banking on Steam to do the heavy lifting, and if so, how will that square with GOG‑style ideals?
I’d have asked Oshry on record: which tradeoff are you actually willing to make — compromise on storefront neutrality for reach, or accept a smaller archival audience to keep DRM‑free principles intact?

New Blood is staking a reputational claim: it will be the sympathetic caretaker of boomer‑shooter adjacent RPGs. That’s a defensible, even noble niche. But it’s a niche nonetheless. The difference between cultural preservation and niche commercialism will be decided in the demo’s reception and the studio’s platform choices over the next few months.
Dungeons of Dusk is being positioned as a preservation‑minded, old‑school RPG rather than a mainstream bid for players. New Blood is chasing authenticity across Steam, GOG, decks and consoles — not mass-market reach. Watch the Feb 23 demo and Oshry’s full comments to see whether that stance holds or becomes a convenient cover for limited ambition.
Get access to exclusive strategies, hidden tips, and pro-level insights that we don't share publicly.
Ultimate Gaming Strategy Guide + Weekly Pro Tips