Overwatch 2 director pledges fixes: Challenger leaderboard tuning, Open Queue support, and

This caught my attention because Blizzard is finally answering some of the most persistent Overwatch 2 headaches with concrete next-step promises – not just reassurance. The issues here touch competitive integrity (leaderboards), player choice (Open Queue and event rewards), and one of the game’s most tactile systems (aim assist). For a live service that’s been through several contentious changes, that combination matters.

Overwatch 2 director Aaron Keller: fixes incoming for Challenger ranks, Open Queue, event rewards and aim assist

• Key takeaways:
• Challenger leaderboard will be re-tuned to weight current rank more and avoid rewarding sheer match volume; a crossplay bug that inflated Diamond placements has been fixed.
• Blizzard is actively researching how to better support 6v6 Open Queue, balancing quick queues versus desire for balanced team comps.
• Event reward progression (cookies) was confusing; Blizzard will make it clearer and avoid forcing players into specific modes for rewards.
• Aim-assist defaults are being reverted and a legacy toggle will arrive next season so players can restore pre‑rework feel.

{{INFO_TABLE_START}}
Publisher|Blizzard Entertainment
Release Date|January 2026
Category|Live service / Competitive updates
Platform|PC, PlayStation, Xbox
{{INFO_TABLE_END}}

Main analysis: what Blizzard is fixing and why it matters

The Challenger Tier was meant to shake up static leaderboards and prevent early-week leaderboard camping – a solid design goal. In practice, the initial tuning leaned too hard on match volume, meaning players who simply played a ton could jump ahead of those who were demonstrably higher skill. That undermines the competitive legitimacy of the board. Keller’s promise to “favor your rank more” signals a return to rank-first sorting while preserving rewards for truly committed players. That’s the right direction: leaderboards should reflect skill first, activity second.

The crossplay bug that let Diamond players spike up rankings added fuel to community frustration. It’s been addressed, but the lesson isn’t just technical: transparent telemetry and clear post-mortems matter. When changes affect everyone’s standing, players expect rapid fixes plus explanations of what went wrong and how future regressions will be prevented.

Open Queue is a thorny product problem. Switching 5v5 to 6v6 in 2025 made the mode more like core matchmaking, but it also split the player base: some use Open Queue for fast pickup games, others wanted the 6v6 team-composition feel. Keller’s line – that Blizzard is collecting player data before committing to heavier support — is sensible. Promises of more “support” could mean anything from dedicated playlists to changes in matchmaking, role-lock options, or incentives. My expectation: iterative, evidence-led adjustments rather than an overnight overhaul.

Event progression confusion around cookie currency is a more straightforward usability failure. Players shouldn’t have to reverse-engineer how to earn event rewards. Committing to clearer UI and to avoid gating rewards behind modes people find unenjoyable is low-hanging fruit that will materially improve player goodwill.

Finally, aim assist. This is both a gameplay and community relations issue. Console aim feel is core to enjoyment and competitive trust, and Keller admits the rollout was handled poorly. Reverting defaults and adding a legacy toggle is a practical fix: it restores familiarity for long-time players and keeps the new system available for those who prefer it. That toggle should be shipped with clear descriptions of each mode’s mechanical differences and ideally a short in-game preview so players can decide before jumping into ranked play.

What this means for players

• Short term: the Diamond leaderboard bug is fixed and some aim-assist defaults have been reverted — immediate relief for affected players.
• Next season: leaderboard tuning and an aim-assist legacy toggle are on the roadmap, but exact timing and the shape of Open Queue support are still vague.
• Long term: this signals a shift toward more data-driven, incremental fixes rather than broad unilateral changes — a welcome posture if Blizzard follows through.

As someone who has followed Overwatch through balance patches, meta shifts and community flare-ups, I’m encouraged by the tone: acknowledgement, concrete fixes, and a willingness to change course. The real test will be speed and clarity — how quickly these tuning passes land, how clearly their effects are communicated, and whether Blizzard resists the temptation to bundle multiple risky changes together.

TL;DR

Aaron Keller says Blizzard will tune the Challenger leaderboard to prioritize rank over playtime, investigate and expand support for 6v6 Open Queue based on player data, clarify event reward progression, and restore aim-assist defaults plus a legacy toggle next season. These are pragmatic fixes that, if delivered transparently and promptly, should calm several of the community’s biggest complaints.