This rumor caught my eye because we’ve been here before. When the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB launched at a midrange price point back in 2023, it was roasted for memory bottlenecks in modern AAA titles. Fast-forward to 2025, and whispers on the Chinese forum BoardChannels claim Nvidia is quietly asking board partners to throttle shipments of the RTX 5060 Ti 8GB, ensuring it never goes on deep discount. The aim? “Accelerate migration” to the 16GB SKU, where the silicon can actually stretch its legs. Nvidia hasn’t put out an official statement—so treat this as rumor with a generous pinch of salt—but if it’s true, this feels like Nvidia admitting by action that 8GB at a $379 MSRP just isn’t cutting it for today’s texture-heavy, ray-traced blockbusters.
The BoardChannels post, attributed to a user named Low-Hand No. 1, says “multiple sources” report Nvidia has implemented “precise strategy control” for RTX 5060 Ti supply. Translated, it means: keep the 8GB version scarce, “prohibit low-price sales,” and steer consumer demand to the 16GB counterpart. That sounds ominously deliberate, and although no Nvidia spokesperson has commented, the playbook matches the 4060 Ti saga: when an SKU underperforms or risks undercutting the next tier, Nvidia throttles channel flow instead of letting street prices crater.
History repeats itself. The RTX 4060 Ti 8GB arrived in June 2023 at $399, only for its 16GB sibling to land three months later at $499. Both cards coexisted in awkward price territory, but reviewers were seldom shown the 8GB model—an early red flag. Supply-chain whispers pegged the 8GB SKU as a “checkbox part” meant to hit a headline price, not a card built to handle asset-heavy games. Now, we might be seeing a redux with the RTX 5060 Ti when its 16GB variant debuts later in 2025.
On paper, the RTX 5060 Ti’s Ada Lovelace architecture is a capable midrange part: 8GB GDDR6, a 180W TDP, and a 3DMark score near 15,800. In practice, however, 8GB VRAM is the choke point as texture pools balloon. Here’s a quick look at VRAM usage in popular titles at 1440p with high or ultra settings:
When you exceed your card’s VRAM budget, you don’t just lose frames—you see hard stutters, asset pop-ins, and brutal 1% lows as the GPU shuffles data over the comparatively slow PCIe bus. Midrange buyers paying $379 rightly expect headroom, not a constant game of memory Tetris.
Memory bandwidth and quantity both matter. When VRAM is full, the GPU swaps textures in and out of system RAM, which sits over PCIe. Even with innovations like Nvidia’s Delta Color Compression or AMD’s Samsung High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) in high-end GPUs, cards still face a stutter wall when VRAM runs dry. Compression algorithms can shrink data in transit, but they can’t conjure more physical capacity.
Then there’s streaming: game engines today preload assets dynamically based on where you’re looking. Faster SSDs and smart streaming pipelines help, but they only mask the real issue—if you’ve already used up your VRAM, streaming has to juggle multiple high-res textures simultaneously, and that juggling act shows up as micro stutters.
Technologies like DLSS and frame generation boost average FPS by reconstructing frames or synthesizing extra frames through AI, but they don’t reduce texture pool sizes. You might hit 100 FPS on frame count, but if your textures keep swapping, that 1% low could drop to 20 FPS every few seconds—hardly smooth.
The RTX 5060 Ti 8GB launched with a $379 MSRP, squarely in midrange territory where buyers expect future-proofing. Yet AMD’s Radeon RX 7700 XT, at $429 MSRP, offers roughly 9% better 3DMark performance, and even used RTX 3080 Ti cards on eBay can be found for around $350, outperforming the 5060 Ti by about 24%. Retailers like Newegg and Amazon briefly dipped the 8GB SKU to $329 in Q1 2025, but those deals vanished as supply dried up.
On the used market, the 8GB model hovers around $340–$360, almost the same as brand-new 16GB SKUs when they go on sale. In contrast, the 16GB 4060 Ti still trades around $480–$500 used, reflecting stronger demand and perceived longevity. If Nvidia truly “prohibits low-price sales,” it’s tacitly agreeing the 8GB SKU isn’t worth deeply discounting.
Not everyone believes this is purely a marketing stunt. Some point to chip yield constraints: GDDR6 memory shortages or wafer defects could limit 8GB module availability. Others suggest Nvidia wants clearer segmentation between entry-level and high-end, preventing the 5060 Ti from cannibalizing sales of the RTX 4070 or 4070 Ti. Both factors might be at play, but the net result is the same: fewer 8GB cards hitting retailer shelves.
If Nvidia’s selective supply strategy pans out, expect the RTX 5060 Ti 8GB to quietly vanish: scarce stock, steadfast MSRPs, and no flashy discount banners. That keeps the marketing narrative clean—“the 16GB model is the real deal”—while sidestepping the PR nightmare of slashing prices on a card that can’t keep up.
More broadly, this saga underscores a lesson Nvidia should have learned during the 4060 Ti cycle: in the midrange sector, VRAM isn’t an optional upsell—it’s table stakes. Today’s mainstream gamers want their buttery 1% lows and next-gen textures without constant asset-tuning sessions.
This rumor, while unconfirmed, tracks logically with Nvidia’s past behavior and the hard data on VRAM usage. With the 8GB SKU near MSRP or above, throttled supply, and a 16GB version looming, the writing is on the wall. If you’re spending midrange money in 2025, make 12–16GB your baseline—or prepare to tweak settings more than you game.
Rumor says Nvidia is tightening RTX 5060 Ti 8GB supply to avoid discounts and push gam ers toward the 16GB version. Modern AAA titles quickly exceed 8GB VRAM at 1440p, so if you’re midrange buying, aim for 12–16GB to avoid future frustration.
Get access to exclusive strategies, hidden tips, and pro-level insights that we don't share publicly.
Ultimate Gaming Strategy Guide + Weekly Pro Tips