
This caught my attention because Skyrim is one of those evergreen games you expect to “just work” when it lands on new hardware. Instead, one day after Bethesda released the Anniversary Edition on Nintendo Switch 2, players flagged serious problems: severe input lag, a locked 30 FPS, and a whopping ~53GB install. Bethesda has acknowledged the issues and says it’s investigating – but for players buying or upgrading, the question is simple: is this playable right now?
Reports center on three concrete pain points. First, input lag. Multiple players describe control delay as “online-fighting-on-a-Switch-Lite bad,” which is a useful, if brutal, shorthand: hits that should feel immediate instead feel delayed, and that kills the core loop of combat, lock-ons, and tight menu navigation.
Second, frame rate. The Anniversary Edition on Switch 2 is locked to 30fps. That’s not necessarily a deal-breaker for a single-player RPG, but when visuals claim DLSS, volumetric lighting, and higher resolution, a 30fps cap looks like a compromise rather than a considered choice — especially if the result is input stutter or lag.
Third, file size and platform ergonomics: the ~53GB download is far larger than older Switch builds and will be painful for users with limited storage. Add the lack of an easy rollback to the prior version and you’ve got a messy upgrade path: uninstall and redownload the older build if you want out, which is time-consuming.

Bethesda has publicly acknowledged the issues and asked players to submit feedback through official channels. That’s the right first step; it signals they’re treating this as a priority. The follow-up questions are timing and scope. Will patches target input latency processing, or will they simply re-tune graphical settings to ease CPU/GPU load? Both are possible — and both matter differently to players.
It’s also worth noting that Bethesda hinted at potential updates that could unlock higher frame rates. Historically, Bethesda can push meaningful performance patches, but fixes for input processing and systemic engine limitations sometimes take longer because they require deeper code changes than graphical tweaks.

Ports are a balancing act. The Switch 2 is significantly more capable than the original, but it’s still a mobile-first architecture with different bottlenecks than PCs or consoles with desktop-class GPUs. Packing in DLSS-like upscaling, volumetrics, and a higher base resolution can expose input processing problems if the engine’s frame submission and input pipelines aren’t fully optimized for the hardware. That appears to be what’s happening: visual fidelity was prioritized at launch, and responsiveness suffered as a result.
Also, DLSS on a handheld-style platform raises implementation questions — upscaling tech isn’t magic; it shifts the compute profile and can introduce micro-stutters if the frame pacing isn’t handled correctly. That may be part of the frame-timing and input symptoms players are describing.

Not yet. Bethesda’s acknowledgement is promising, but the issues reported — especially severe input lag — materially change whether Skyrim feels playable. If you prize smooth controls and tight combat, wait for patches and community confirmation of fixes. If you can tolerate the lag or care more about visuals than responsiveness, the port will still offer the classic Skyrim experience with prettier effects, but be prepared for a bumpy ride.
Finally: keep an eye on patch notes and community threads. Bethesda’s track record means this will likely get better, but the timeline is what matters to players deciding whether to buy now or wait a few weeks for fixes.
Get access to exclusive strategies, hidden tips, and pro-level insights that we don't share publicly.
Ultimate Gaming Strategy Guide + Weekly Pro Tips