Jason Schreier’s latest piece nails the feeling we all share: there are simply too many games. Steam has already seen over 14,600 releases in 2025, and juggernauts like Hollow Knight: Silksong and Hades II launched just 21 days apart—a snapshot of this year’s chaos. As someone juggling a never-ending backlog and embargo dates, I’m not celebrating abundance. I’m bracing for impact.
Here’s the thesis: game discovery has broken under a tsunami of quality titles, and without a drastic shift in how players browse, studios schedule, and platforms curate, mid-tier games will drown—and player enthusiasm will fatigue.
We’ve seen packed launch windows before—2017’s Zelda/Mario/Elden boom, 2023’s Baldur’s Gate 3 vs. Starfield—but 2025 feels different. Not only are there more releases, but exceptional games now stack atop one another like Jenga blocks. Steam’s lower barriers to public release, readily available engines like Unity and Unreal, and a backlog of post-pandemic projects all converge at once. The pipeline never sleeps, and neither do the release dates.
Meanwhile, player demand hasn’t kept pace. Studies show nearly two-thirds of American players buy just one or two games per year. If your launch isn’t the one they choose—or isn’t included in a subscription service—you’re fighting for scraps. This is the uncomfortable truth under the “indie golden age” banner.
Services like Xbox Game Pass, PlayStation Plus, and even Nintendo Switch Online Supercharge sampling behavior. Game Pass alone boasts over 40 million subscribers, who treat it like a buffet: graze widely, buy sparingly. It’s fantastic for players wanting variety, but it compresses launch-week sales for mid-budget titles outside those services. AA studios must either negotiate lucrative day-one inclusion deals or risk obscurity.
“Subscriptions have become a double-edged sword,” said an ID@Xbox representative. “We want members to discover hidden gems, but in a window where every game competes for attention, some simply don’t break through without heavy promotion or service placement.”
The paradox: subscriptions can extend a game’s lifespan on the front page, but they often require studios to cede pricing autonomy and revenue share. The result is a trade-off between short-term breathability and long-term financial growth.
It isn’t all doom and gloom for smaller studios. A handful of titles prove that with the right hook and strategy, you can break through:
These case studies share common threads: a razor-sharp core mechanic, a communal development narrative, and visible milestone updates. They didn’t outspend the giants—they out-narrated them.
Mid-tier studios face brutal odds. Industry analysts estimate that roughly one-third of new Steam titles in 2024 failed to exceed 500 owners in their first month. That’s not quality bias—it’s attention scarcity. “We had a fantastic demo lined up,” recalls an indie founder. “But dropping our full campaign during Silksong’s launch window meant we peaked at 200 concurrent players.”
Platform holders are aware. At a recent PlayStation Indies showcase, the head of indie relations noted that curated sale events increased visibility for participating titles by over 150%. On Xbox, timed promotions tied to Series X|S Feature Drops can temporarily bump a hidden gem into the top-10 charts. Yet these spots are limited, and competition is fierce even for those slots.
If you’re suffering decision paralysis on Steam’s front page, you’re not alone. The algorithm prioritizes wishlisted or trending hits; everything else needs a miracle—or a viral TikTok clip—to surface. The result is FOMO meets fatigue: you want to play everything, but end up finishing nothing.
My coping strategy in 2025 has been ruthless:
This method isn’t perfect, but it reduces choice paralysis and ensures I actually finish titles I love.
Quality remains a prerequisite, but it’s no longer a differentiator by itself. Smart studios now think beyond launch week, embracing a “long tail” model:
Delaying into air—waiting for a quieter moment—may feel counterintuitive, but it often yields a higher wish-to-purchase ratio. In a world where one viral clip can break or bury you, maximizing the odds of that moment is everything.
For AA projects priced $30–$50, you need either strong IP recognition, a standout one-sentence pitch, or a service deal to de-risk. Otherwise you’re praying for word of mouth in a week packed with equally credible contenders.
If platform holders unleash new hardware or stack subscription calendars even tighter in 2026, marketing windows will compress further and day-one service deals will multiply. The winners will be games that communicate value clearly, respect players’ time, and build communities that extend beyond launch week. Without industry-wide recalibration, we’ll keep seeing buried releases and painful postmortems.
This surge of games isn’t the death of creativity—it’s the price of abundance without curation. The good news? Players still reward excellence and identity. The real challenge is being seen long enough to show it.
2025’s “too many games” problem is real—14,600+ Steam launches and blockbuster pile-ups have broken discovery. Players: buy less, play smarter, and back standouts that respect your time. Studios: prioritize timing, community, and clarity over spray-and-pray launches. Platforms: expand curation and discovery tools to prevent great games from drowning.
Get access to exclusive strategies, hidden tips, and pro-level insights that we don't share publicly.
Ultimate Gaming Strategy Guide + Weekly Pro Tips