
Game intel
Arc Raiders
ARC Raiders is a multiplayer extraction adventure, set in a lethal future earth, ravaged by a mysterious mechanized threat known as ARC. Enlist as a Raider and…
Arc Raiders hitting a $40 price tag instead of staying free-to-play grabbed my attention because it’s a public experiment in how you monetize multiplayer without devolving into predatory microtransactions. Embark Studios shifted from F2P to a $39.99 standard edition, leaned on Helldivers 2 as inspiration, and ended up with over 12 million copies sold, roughly $350 million in net revenue, and a peak daily user count on January 4, 2026. That’s more than a success story—it’s a data point for any studio weighing a free door versus earning trust with a modest upfront fee.
The last decade saw free-to-play dominate multiplayer shooters: low barriers, massive user acquisition, then endless microtransactions and grind walls. But F2P turned toxic in many cases—players burned out on pay-to-win loot boxes, aggressive battle passes, and gating core progression. Premium launch prices climbed to $70, leaving mid-tier studios vulnerable: too pricey to compete, too expensive to sustain steady live updates.
Arc Raiders sits in the middle. By charging $40, Embark Studios aimed to avoid F2P’s worst pitfalls—grind, pay walls, community churn—while still funding a live-service roadmap. Premium enough to build trust, affordable enough to attract hundreds of thousands of players out of the gate.
Helldivers 2, also a $40 multiplayer shooter without a campaign, proved there’s room between F2P and full-price. Producer Patrick Söderlund told GamesBeat, “We basically looked at games like Helldivers and other titles and decided, ‘OK, that is where we should sit.’ We didn’t have a campaign, so we figured we don’t want the price to be an offender for someone. We’d rather make people feel like it’s totally worth 40 bucks.” Embark borrowed that principle: strong core loop, single entry fee, ongoing seasons.
Within weeks of Helldivers 2’s late 2024 launch, concurrent player peaks rivaled big-budget F2P titles. Embark saw the same potential: apply that recipe to extraction shooters, where tension and loot risk drive the fun.
First, $40 hits the psychological “sweet spot.” It’s low enough for impulse buys—especially on Steam sales or console discounts—yet substantial enough to cover six months of live updates, seasonal events, and developer support. Embark’s roadmap includes four major seasons and weekly challenges, all funded by front-loaded revenue.

The extraction loop amplifies the value proposition. You drop into a procedurally generated hotspot, scavenge rare resources from AI-controlled “Arks,” then race to extract before rival squads or environmental hazards get you. Lose your gear, and the sting feels earned. Win, and that sense of relief and accomplishment makes the $40 feel trivial.
Player Perspective: One Steam reviewer wrote, “I’ve sunk 60 hours and never felt pushed into microtransactions. It feels worth $70 but only costs $40.” That community praise echoes across forums: upfront cost equals peace of mind.
Let’s talk numbers. Arc Raiders has sold 12 million copies worldwide, with about 7 million on Steam and the rest split between PS5 and Xbox Series X|S. At $39.99 a pop, gross revenue approaches $480 million. After platform fees, taxes, and operational costs, Embark disclosed roughly $350 million in net revenue by March 2026.
Peak daily users hit on January 4, 2026, just after Season 2 launched, when concurrent player counts topped 1.2 million. Weekly active users (WAU) hold above 4 million, and monthly active users (MAU) hover around 7 million, giving a healthy DAU/MAU ratio of ~0.6—an indicator of strong retention.

If you’re weighing this model for your studio—or just curious as a gamer—keep an eye on:
Those metrics separate a healthy premium multiplayer live service from one that’s burning out after launch month.
Charging $40 isn’t a magic bullet. Risks include:
Smaller indie studios, in particular, need to map their content pipeline and budget carefully before betting on a premium tag.
If you’re eyeing Arc Raiders or a similar $40 shooter, here’s how to get the most bang for your buck:
On PC, mouse and keyboard precision shines in firefights. On PS5, adaptive triggers and haptics amplify tension when Arks ambush you.
Embark’s decision to use AI-generated voice lines has sparked debate. The studio defends it as a cost-saving for live services that require thousands of dialogue cues. But there are real questions:

I’m cautiously optimistic: if AI lines are indistinguishable and free developers to build actual content, it’s a net win. But if studios lean too hard on synthetic audio to cut corners, the community will notice—and backlash could be severe.
Arc Raiders proved there’s appetite for a premium-priced multiplayer model that sits below the $60–$70 bracket. Already, several upcoming shooters have flirted with the $35–$45 range, citing Arc Raiders’ success as validation. But the long game remains unwritten.
Publishers could weaponize a “$40 = ethical” marketing angle while still peppering in loot boxes and battle passes. Meanwhile, smaller teams without Embark’s resources might struggle to sustain live-service expectations on a one-time fee. Gamers should watch launch roadmaps, content pipelines, and community engagement before pressing “Buy.”
Arc Raiders’ $40 experiment shows premium multiplayer can thrive without F2P’s dark side—provided studios commit to consistent, non-exploitative content. As other developers test the mid-tier price point, players will reward those who balance affordability with genuine live-service support. In today’s crowded shooter market, that trust might be worth more than any microtransaction.
Get access to exclusive strategies, hidden tips, and pro-level insights that we don't share publicly.
Ultimate Gaming Strategy Guide + Weekly Pro Tips