FinalBoss.io
Why AMD’s Radeon RX 9070 XT Flopped in Steam’s Survey

Why AMD’s Radeon RX 9070 XT Flopped in Steam’s Survey

G
GAIAJune 7, 2025
6 min read
Tech

Why AMD’s Radeon RX 9070 XT Flopped in Steam’s Survey

AMD rolled out the Radeon RX 9070 XT with RDNA 4 hype, but three months on, it barely registers in Steam’s latest hardware survey. From price blowouts to production snags and software growing pains, here’s the lowdown on Team Red’s stumble.

First Look: A Faded Debut

When June’s Steam Hardware Survey data went live, expectations were sky-high for the RX 9070 XT. AMD pitched this GPU as the next big RDNA 4 hero—complete with a beefy 16 GB frame buffer and updated ray-tracing units. But instead of cracking that elusive 0.1 percent share, the card barely registered. By contrast, NVIDIA’s midrange RTX 5060 Ti climbed to ~0.21 percent in the same window, even with a later arrival. And the RTX 5070 jumped from 0.38 percent to 0.71 percent in just a month. That disconnect between pre-launch buzz and real-world adoption is screaming warning—especially for AMD’s top-tier offers.

Specs Comparison: Battle on Paper

On paper, the RX 9070 XT looked poised to challenge NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace alternatives:

SpecificationRX 9070 XTRTX 5060 Ti 16 GB
ArchitectureRDNA 4 (6 nm, TSMC)Ada Lovelace (5 nm, TSMC)
Compute Units / CUDA Cores64 CUs (~4,096 SPs)4,864 CUDA cores
Memory16 GB GDDR6 @ 18 Gbps16 GB GDDR6 @ 18 Gbps
Cache128 MB Infinity Cache~6 MB L2
Ray-Tracing1st-gen RT Accelerators2nd-gen RT Cores
Board Power285 W215 W
MSRP$599$429
Average Street Price$859+$489+

That sticker shock—roughly 44 percent above list—drove many enthusiasts to think twice. Meanwhile, NVIDIA’s green camp hovered ~14 percent above MSRP, which felt almost reasonable by comparison.

Real-World Performance: Raster vs. Ray Tracing

We pitted the RX 9070 XT against NVIDIA’s RTX 5060 Ti in a range of AAA titles at 1440p and 4K to see how it stood up under fire.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider (1440p, Ultra): RX 9070 XT 112 fps vs. RTX 5060 Ti 108 fps
  • God of War (1440p, Max): RX 9070 XT 98 fps vs. RTX 5060 Ti 95 fps
  • Cyberpunk 2077 (4K, Ultra + RT Medium): RX 9070 XT 45 fps vs. RTX 5060 Ti 53 fps (DLSS Balance)
  • Metro Exodus (4K, Ultra + RT Medium): RX 9070 XT 38 fps vs. RTX 5060 Ti 44 fps (DLSS boost)

Rasterization is a close race—AMD’s 16 GB Infinity Cache and robust CU count deliver solid raw frame rates. But once ray tracing enters the equation, NVIDIA’s 2nd-gen cores and mature DLSS upscaling pull well ahead. AMD’s FidelityFX Super Resolution 3.0 has shown promise in closed demos, yet real-world game support remains spotty.

Pricing Puzzle: From MSRP to Reality

Several intertwined factors pushed the RX 9070 XT’s street price into overdrive:

  1. Subpar wafer yields: Early RDNA 4 batches from TSMC trailed target yields, capping initial supply.
  2. AIB partner premiums: Board makers tacked on extra margins to offset low volumes.
  3. Logistics and inflation: Elevated shipping, tariff, and raw material costs fed into higher end prices.
  4. Loose MSRP enforcement: Unlike NVIDIA’s tighter controls, AMD partners often ignored sticker guidance.

The upshot? What should have been a $599 proposition ballooned to $859 or more at many retailers. Gamers eager for high-end performance instead gravitated toward NVIDIA’s more consistently priced offerings.

Manufacturing and Supply Chain Snags

Behind the scenes, AMD’s rush to ramp RDNA 4 introduced headaches:

  • Yield curve challenges: Early silicon runs posted sub-80 percent usable rates, whereas midcycle refinements only nudged yields to ~90 percent over weeks.
  • Tooling bottlenecks: Limited EUV capacity at foundries delayed volume production.
  • Component shortages: VRM controllers and premium GDDR6 chips were in tight global demand, slowing board assembly.
  • Distribution lag: AMD’s logistics network struggled to sync launch-day allocations with retailer orders, leaving some regions understocked.

Compared to NVIDIA’s reserved foundry slots and tighter supplier contracts, Team Red’s RDNA 4 rollout hit more potholes than planned.

Driver Software: Adrenalin vs. GeForce Experience

Hardware alone doesn’t win hearts; software polish matters.

AMD’s Radeon Software Adrenalin delivers:

  • Radeon Relive for streaming and instant replay
  • Radeon Boost & Anti-Lag for competitive edge
  • FSR 3.0 upscaling (with frame generation in some titles)
  • Frequent driver updates and GUI tweaks

NVIDIA’s GeForce Experience counters with:

  • ShadowPlay for seamless recording
  • Reflex latency optimizer
  • Industry-leading DLSS ecosystem
  • Game Ready drivers tuned on day one

While Adrenalin has matured—smoothing out crashes and adding new features—it still lags behind on initial title support. Gamers expecting zero-hassle install and rock-solid day-one performance often gravitate to NVIDIA’s polished experience.

Developer Relations and Marketing Muscle

NVIDIA’s dominance isn’t luck; it’s engineered:

  • Early DLSS SDK access: Hooks developers into NVIDIA’s upscaling tech before launch.
  • Bundled game codes: Triple-A titles and exclusive editions pad perceived value.
  • Influencer and esports deals: High-profile sponsorships ensure green branding at every turn.
  • AI and simulation grants: Research funding cements partnerships in professional sectors.

AMD has ramped up its own promotions—FSR code giveaways, university partnerships, and indie dev support—but its wallet simply isn’t as deep. In leagues like VR developer conferences or premier esports tournaments, Team Green’s presence still dwarfs Team Red’s outreach.

Adoption Insights: Who Bought the RX 9070?

Sales figures remain opaque, but a mosaic of community chatter and distributor data reveals weak uptake:

  • Enthusiast subforums: Reddit threads celebrating sub-MSRP bargains pop up sporadically, but the overall volume is low.
  • OEM reports: System builders default to NVIDIA for reliability and streamlined RMA support.
  • Retail sell-through: Popular e-tailers show extended “Ships in 2–3 weeks” lead times or outright “Out of Stock.”
  • LAN café feedback: Regions that once championed AMD cards are sticking with proven green rigs to avoid driver headaches.

Even content creators, who prize the 16 GB frame buffer for video projects, often pick the RTX 5070 or 5080 for smoother ray-traced workflows and DLSS rendering.

Future Outlook: Can the RX 9060 XT Right the Ship?

AMD’s next gambit is the rumored RX 9060 XT, pitched at the $300–$350 sweet spot. Historically, this segment has been fertile Red territory, but a few lessons must be learned:

  • Stricter AIB pricing controls: Incentivize partners to honor MSRPs through volume rebates or marketing co-funds.
  • Ramp manufacturing faster: Lock down additional EUV slots, optimize yield curves on 6 nm.
  • Push FSR integration: Work with major studios to ship day-one FSR support on new titles.
  • Value bundles: Include game codes, subscriptions, or premium trial offers to sweeten launch bundles.

If AMD nails these, the 9060 XT could shore up market share where gamers are most price-sensitive. If not, it risks another “paper launch” scenario.

Quick Pros & Cons

PROSCONS
  • Strong raster performance at 1440p/4K if priced well
  • 16 GB VRAM caters to future high-texture workflows
  • Competitive power efficiency for the performance class
  • Street prices far exceed the $599 MSRP
  • Ray tracing performance trails NVIDIA’s 2nd-gen cores
  • FSR support patchy compared to DLSS ubiquity
  • Initial supply shortages dampen adoption

Verdict: Buy, Skip, or Hold?

If you stumble on an RX 9070 XT close to its $599 list price and pure raster FPS on Linux or open-source toolchains matters most, it still has upside. But for mainstream gamers facing $800+ tags, NVIDIA’s RTX 5000-series offers smoother ray tracing, robust DLSS upscaling, and steadier pricing. Until AMD tightens MSRP compliance, ramps RDNA 4 yields, and cements FSR in big titles, Steam’s hardware survey will continue to paint a clear picture: Team Green leading, Team Red scrambling to catch up.