
When Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 threw that final prompt at me – fight as Maelle or fight as Verso – I froze. Not in the “which cutscene looks cooler” way, but in the “this is clearly a philosophy exam in disguise” way. I’d spent hours in this painted world, getting attached to these people and the Canvas itself, and suddenly the game boiled everything down to one irreversible choice.
If you’re here, you probably feel the same thing I did: this isn’t just about seeing two different endings. It’s about deciding what you think grief, escapism, and “moving on” actually mean – and then watching the game judge you for it. The wild part is that the story quietly favors one answer, while the mechanics reward the other.
So I’m going to do two things here: give you a practical, spoiler-heavy guide to how to get both endings with smart saves, and then be totally honest about what each ending is really saying – and why I think one of them is emotionally brutal in exactly the right way.
This article contains full spoilers for both endings of Clair Obscur: Expedition 33. I’ll mark the structural/“how to” parts clearly, but if you haven’t finished the game once, I strongly recommend doing that before reading the story breakdowns.
I’ve got a soft spot for RPGs that weaponize their endings. I grew up on games that guilt-trip you for taking the “selfish” route, hand you a miserable cutscene, and then quietly dare you to do better. Expedition 33 is more insidious than that. It tells you, outright, that there are no good or bad endings – that it’s all about your values – and then stacks the deck in a way that makes you question what those values actually are.
The first time, I went with my gut and chose Maelle. I wanted my companions alive. I wanted the Canvas to survive because, honestly, I didn’t want all those hours I’d spent in that world to be for nothing. Then, when the credits rolled, I sat there feeling <emdeeply< em=""> wrong about it – like I’d chosen comfort over honesty. Running Verso’s ending afterward felt less rewarding in terms of loot, but emotionally, it clicked everything into place.
That’s the lens I’m coming from: I care less about cosmetics and more about what the story is actually saying about grief and letting go. So I’m going to be blunt where the game is coy.
Let’s get the practical stuff out of the way, because the game does not hold your hand here.
The crucial moment is simple but easy to blow past if you’re not prepared:
Once you confirm that choice and go into the fight, you are locked into that character’s ending. Your only way to see the other one in the same playthrough is to reload a manual save from before that decision.
There’s no New Game+ that lets you import progress and make a different final choice, and no secret third ending hiding behind collectibles or perfect runs. It’s just those two routes, tied to that one decision.
Maelle wins. The Canvas – this beautiful, painted world where she feels whole – is preserved. The companions you’ve lost are restored. You get that warm, bittersweet RPG closure where everyone you cared about is together again, and for a moment, it feels like you made the “kind” choice.

But the camera and tone won’t let you just bask in that. The ending leans into how artificial the Canvas really is. We’re reminded that this painted reality is a construct tied to Alicia, the real-world girl whose grief created and sustains it. Maelle’s choice effectively says:
The companions are back, yes – but they’re back in a world that only exists because a family never moved on. It’s comforting, generous, and deeply selfish, all at the same time.
Here’s where the game plays dirty in the other direction: mechanically, Maelle’s Ending is “better”.
If you care about squeezing every cosmetic drop out of a game, this ending is non‑negotiable. From a pure rewards perspective, if someone told me, “I’m only going to see one ending,” Maelle’s is the one that gives more back in terms of content.
The more I sat with this ending, the darker it felt.
By preserving the Canvas, Maelle is effectively resetting the board. A new set of Lumierians, a new cycle, a new painted existence… all still anchored to Alicia’s fragile, real-world life. Once Alicia dies, the Canvas and everything in it is gone. Some players have fairly called this out as flirting with the idea of a “second genocide”: you’ve just created more beings whose existence is contingent on a single grieving human surviving.
So yes, Maelle’s Ending is emotionally satisfying in the moment. Your friends live. The world you know survives. But scratch the surface and it feels like institutionalized denial. It’s the ending for people who can’t bear to shut the door on what they’ve lost – which is exactly why it’s powerful, and exactly why it sits in my stomach like a stone.
FinalBoss // Gear
Level up your setup
01Top-rated gaming headsetson Amazon→02High-refresh gaming monitorson Amazon→03Gaming chairson Amazon→04Discounted game keyson Kinguin→Affiliate links · As an Amazon Associate, FinalBoss earns from qualifying purchases.
Here, Verso chooses the nuclear option: destroy the Canvas entirely.
The painted world collapses. Its people vanish. The Dessendre family’s curse, their endless dance with the Paintress and these constructed cycles of grief, is finally broken. It’s not noble in a sweeping, triumphant way; it’s intimate and ugly and final. Verso sacrifices everything – including the home we’ve just spent a whole game learning to love – so that Alicia can no longer hide behind it.
In the epilogue, we see Alicia and her family visiting Verso’s grave. Then, in a brutal touch of symmetry, her family members begin to disappear from her life, echoing the way Verso had watched allies vanish earlier in the story. It’s the game’s way of saying: grief never really stops; it just keeps changing shape.
By the end, Alicia is alone. There’s no painted world to retreat to, no canvas safety net. Just her, her loss, and the need to keep living anyway.
Verso’s Ending is almost comically under-rewarded compared to Maelle’s, and that’s 100% intentional.

It’s like the developers are whispering: “If you’re here, you’re not here for the loot.” This ending is mechanically stingy to match its thematic core: you choose loss, and you don’t get compensated for it.
The game never stamps “TRUE END” on Verso’s route, but the framing is loud. It’s the ending that:
It’s not hopeful in the traditional sense, but it is honest. Where Maelle’s path clings to a curated, painted version of life, Verso’s acknowledges that real life is finite, messy, and full of permanent goodbyes. As someone who’s had to sit with real-world grief, this ending landed like a punch I was grateful for. It doesn’t soothe. It respects you enough not to.
Get access to exclusive strategies, hidden tips, and pro-level insights that we don't share publicly.
Ultimate Gaming Strategy Guide + Weekly Pro Tips
The game says there are “technically no good or bad endings,” and on a philosophical level, that’s true. Both endings are tragedies, just with different casualties. But if you twist my arm, here’s how I’d break it down.
My personal recommendation? Do Maelle’s first, then Verso’s. Let yourself enjoy the illusion, get your unlocks, and feel the warmth of that “everyone’s back” moment. Then go back, burn it all down with Verso, and sit with what the game is actually telling you about grief and letting go. Experiencing them in that order turned Verso’s ending from sad into inevitable.
What I love most about Expedition 33 is that it refuses a neat, heroic solution. There is no path where:
Instead, you get two mutually exclusive philosophies:
And just to make sure you actually wrestle with that, the designers cross the wires:
This is the kind of design that sticks with me. It’s not just an A/B choice; it’s a mirror. Do you instinctively chase rewards? Do you instinctively chase “true endings”? Either way, the game makes you conscious of that instinct.
From what I’ve seen, players are genuinely divided, and that division makes perfect sense.
I’m sympathetic to all three groups, but I fall squarely in the Verso camp. To me, the tragedy of Maelle’s Ending is that it pretends to be merciful while quietly setting up more future suffering. Verso’s Ending, by contrast, doesn’t hide the pain. It ends the world so that a person can live.
If you’ve skimmed down here, here’s the condensed, no-fluff version from someone who’s made both choices and sat with them:
In the end, Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 doesn’t ask, “Did you get the good ending?” It asks, “What did you value when it finally mattered?” And that’s a question I’ll take with me long after the Canvas is gone.